Author: Slater Wold
Date: 14:47:56 02/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
About $50,000 and 2 years. On February 17, 2004 at 16:56:46, Bob Durrett wrote: > >If one ignores the many anticipated objections to doing this research, then what >would it take? > >I can see the following process: > >(1) A list of blocks of code which could be "hardware-ized" is made and the >list ordered in order of decreasing expected benefit. > >(2) Then, the powers that be would decide which blocks to do that to. > >(3) Then it would be done. Testing and tuning would follow. > >(4) Then a match would be set up with Kasparov. > >(5) Etceteras. > >By "hardware-izing" I mean creating a chip which could input it's input data, >process that data, and output that data all within the time of a few clock >cycles of a modern microprocessor chip. > >QUESTIONS: > >Which block of Crafty code would be chosen first? How much benefit to expect? > >Same questions for second block of code. > >Etceteras for the rest of the code until nothing is left. > >Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.