Author: blass uri
Date: 12:01:11 12/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 07, 1998 at 08:52:02, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 07, 1998 at 08:23:01, blass uri wrote: > >>>>I use Junior5 in the championship of Israel and most of the moves are the moves >>>>of Junior5 after some hours of analyzing. >>>> >>>>In 2 games all of the moves out of the opening were the moves of Junior5. > >>>>Uri > >>>That is s.th. I don't understand. Did you enter the competition as JUNIOR5 >>>(Operator Blass Uri)? That would make sense and make such championships boring >>>and a computerchess CC. >> >>I entered the competition as Uri blass but most of the moves were of Junior >>and in two games I did not change moves of Junior >> >>To be more exact In 1 game all of the moves after theory of opening were of >>Junior4.6 with 5 hours per move(This game began in january and ended in April). >>and in another game(The opponent registered late) all of the moves after theory >>were of Junior5(beta) or Junior5 with some hours per move but I did not use a >>fixed time per move. >>(The second game began in May and ended yesterday). >>Uri > >I only wondered what is the fun to let a computer play games and name them as >own ones? one of the games was published in a chess newspaper in Israel and I did not hide the fact that Junior4.6 chose all the moves. You could easily have entered as Junior, operator Blas Uri instead and >would be the truth. Instead you pretend to play on your own. It is legal to use computers in this tournament so I did not cheat. I believed that a computer is good enough to play in the final of the championship of Israel before this tournament. Now I am not sure about it. There are 1/2 final 3/4 final and final I planned before the 1/2 final to play only with the computer but I did not follow my plan because I was afraid in some games to do all the moves by the computer I started to play when I was in theory with Genius3 I had a bad opinion about theory because I saw cases when computers did mistakes and lost only because of theory. I decided because of this reason to give the computer to calculate the opening moves. I found that this decision is more dangerous because the computer sometimes can do even after hours a mistake of not finding the theoretic good move so I decided to change the move to a theoretic move in one game In some games the opening was a bad choice for a computer and I had to change some moves in positions that it does not understand. Another problem was that I started with Genius3 and continued with Junior4.6. (I say that Junior4.6 won 1 game because the first 2 moves were identical to the game that Junior won Fritz5 in the WMCC moves 3-10 were theory that was found by Genius3 by search and the other moves were of Junior4.6). I think that next time when I use a computer I will use it by a more intelligent way(I consider to use Rebel10 with EOC in the 3/4 final). I was asked to use only a computer in the 3/4 final(probably begins in 1.7.99) I did not decide if to do it Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.