Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hydra Mystery Remains Unsolved

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 17:10:25 02/17/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2004 at 20:04:13, Anson T J wrote:

>On February 17, 2004 at 13:01:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On February 17, 2004 at 12:25:18, Anson T J wrote:
>>
>>>On February 17, 2004 at 10:30:32, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 17, 2004 at 08:41:16, Bob Durrett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The fact is that Hydra whipped a bunch of conventional chess computers at
>>>>>Paderborn.  That fact is indisputable.
>>>>>
>>>>>How???
>>>>>
>>>>>How could Hydra, chugging away at the clock rate of a slow snail, win against
>>>>>the high-nps conventional machines?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't understand the question.  Hydra probably hit speeds of 15-20M nodes per
>>>>second.  How is that "a slow snail"???
>>>>
>>>>It was the fastest thing playing there by a factor of at least 4x...
>>>
>>>I think he is talking about the clock speed of the boards. I don't know the
>>>clock speed of the boards but I would imagine they are slower than GHz.
>>
>>Yes, but who cares?  It is the NPS that determines how fast a chess program
>>searches, and their NPS was above anything else by a big margin.
>>
>>Would it matter if someone showed up with an Indy car that ran 300mph but with
>>an engine that only turned 4,800 RPM?  Would that be considered "slow" since the
>>rest are hitting 10K+ on their tachs???
>
>I understand this, but the orignial poster did not. I'm just trying to explain
>what he was thinking. Its not obvious why a "30Hz" card should produce more nps
>than a 2GHz cpu.

You got that right!

The Hydra mystery is especially mysterious because they seem to have produced
Hydra for a halfway reasonable amount of money.  That is the REAL
accomplishment!  What could they have accomplished if money were no problem?

Bob D.

>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>They say "nps isn't everything."  But could the truth be "nps isn't anything"?
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe conventional wisdom ["The Earth is flat"] isn't right after all.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anybody understand what happened?  I feel that the results were monumental!
>>>>>
>>>>>Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.