Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: On topic ?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:21:21 02/17/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2004 at 21:54:23, Duncan Roberts wrote:

>would any chess programmers like to brain fingerprint a gm while playing chess
>to see how he makes his decisions ?
>

Yes, but nobody knows how to do it.  Charting electrical activity doesn't say a
thing about how/what the brain is actually doing...



>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3495433.stm
>
>Brain fingerprints under scrutiny
>
>By Becky McCall
>in Seattle
>
>
>
>The technique relies on electrical signals in the brain
>A controversial technique for identifying a criminal mind using involuntary
>brainwaves that could reveal guilt or innocence is about to take centre stage in
>a last-chance court appeal against a death-row conviction in the US.
>The technique, called "brain fingerprinting", has already been tested by the FBI
>and has now become part of the key evidence to overturn the murder conviction of
>Jimmy Ray Slaughter who is facing execution in Oklahoma.
>
>Brain Fingerprinting, developed by Dr Larry Farwell, chief scientist and founder
>of Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories, is a method of reading the brain's
>involuntary electrical activity in response to a subject being shown certain
>images relating to a crime.
>
>Unlike the polygraph or lie detector to which it is often compared, the accuracy
>of this technology lies in its ability to pick up the electrical signal, known
>as a p300 wave, before the suspect has time to affect the output.
>
>"It is highly scientific, brain fingerprinting doesn't have anything to do with
>the emotions, whether a person is sweating or not; it simply detects
>scientifically if that information is stored in the brain," says Dr Farwell.
>
>"It doesn't depend upon the subjective interpretation of the person conducting
>the test. The computer monitors the information and comes up with information
>present or information absent."
>
>  brain fingerprinting doesn't have anything to do with the emotions, whether a
>person is sweating or not; it simply detects scientifically if that information
>is stored in the brain
>
>Dr Larry Farwell
>Brain fingerprinting is admissible in court for use in identifying or
>exonerating individuals in the US.
>
>Maximum security
>
>A few days ago Dr Farwell ran the test on Jimmy Ray Slaughter at the maximum
>security state prison in Oklahoma.
>
>A jury convicted Slaughter of shooting, stabbing and mutilating his former
>girlfriend, Melody Wuertz, and of shooting to death their eleven-month
>old-daughter, Jessica.
>
>The crimes for which he is sentenced to death took place in a house that he is
>very familiar with. The results were revealing.
>
>"Jimmy Ray Slaughter did not know where in the house the murder took place; he
>didn't know where the mother's body was lying or what was on her clothing at the
>time of death - a salient fact in the case," says Dr Farwell.
>
>During the test, the suspect wears a headband equipped with sensors to measure
>activity in response to recognition of an image relating to the crime - for
>example, a murder weapon or possibly a code word in the case of a spy.
>
>
>Dr Farwell claims some tests were 100% accurate
>"In research with the FBI, we presented words and phrases that only an FBI agent
>would know and we could tell by the brain responses who was an FBI agent and who
>was not; we could do that with 100% accuracy," says Dr Farwell.
>
>Brain Fingerprinting has profound implications for the criminal justice system.
>
>Any decision relies on more than just the outcome of a forensic test such as
>brain fingerprinting. However, in the light of these findings, the case for
>appeal hopes that Slaughter will either be granted a pardon, clemency or a
>retrial.
>
>Critics of brain fingerprinting believe it needs far more refinement before its
>use becomes widespread and cases are won and lost on its evidence.
>
>Needless to say, Dr Farwell disagrees.
>
>"What I can say definitively from a scientific standpoint, is that Jimmy Ray
>Slaughter's brain does not contain a record of some of the most salient details
>about the murder for which he's been convicted and sentenced to death," says Dr
>Farwell.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.