Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:58:12 02/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2004 at 03:13:41, Steffen Jakob wrote: >On February 17, 2004 at 22:59:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >// ... > >>My own impression is as follows: I've played them several games on ICC in the >>past, and I have watched them play others. The thing is strong, but no stronger >>than other programs. IE I have this strong feeling that the new Hiarcs is >>probably better, for example, without exotic hardware, based on lots of games >>Enrique and I have played on ICC prior to CCT. >> >>I'd never say Hydra is weak, but I'd never say it is head and shoulders above >>the rest either... it is just very good, nothing more. > >When you played Brutus the program was very young and cannot really be compared >with the current version. Moreover you played against one card only. > >Greetings, >Steffen. One card doesn't matter. I used hardware 1/8th the speed of my CCT6 machine, so 8 cards would just maintain "status quo". However, I have looked at the Paderborn games, and nothing stands out to me, except that it seems to have a rather ridiculous weighting for passed pawns, that is going to get it into great trouble over time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.