Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 14:18:03 02/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2004 at 16:47:15, Slater Wold wrote: >On February 18, 2004 at 16:02:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 18, 2004 at 15:37:57, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On February 18, 2004 at 15:21:06, Frank Phillips wrote: >>> >>>>On February 18, 2004 at 15:14:09, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://developer.intel.com/technology/64bitextensions/ >>>>> >>>>>Apparently it's the AMD64 instruction set. >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>GCP >>>> >>>>Was it ever anything other than inevitable. I guess the problem is the >>>>undermining the Itanic. >>>> >>>>No doubt we will now see Window64 soon. >>> >>>There was a huge bitch session on the WAMD64 newsgroup about this. >>> >>>AMD has has the Opteron/FX out for 9 months. No Windows OS for it. >>> >>>The *DAY* Intel releases their Xeon64, Windows 64 will be released. >>> >>>It's all about M-O-N-E-Y. >> >>Fortunately none of that bothered me. Linux-64 is already working. :) >> >>As is gcc-64. > >I ain't paying $120 for SuSe. > >There's something about paying for Linux, that just bothers me. You can install Suse9-amd64 on the net for $0. Just download the x86-64bit boot image and have a ago. At university, we had Suse9 installed in ca. 1 hour and it was as easy to set up as Windows. Installing over LAN was nearly faster than from CD, but i wouldn't try it with dial-up. :)) regards Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.