Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 22:32:52 02/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2004 at 01:21:36, Slater Wold wrote: >On February 19, 2004 at 01:12:57, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On February 19, 2004 at 00:59:17, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2004 at 00:33:08, Russell Reagan wrote: >>> >>>>Does Crafty run faster on Opteron or Itanium? >>> >>>From someone who just spent a bunch of money on a 64bit machine; don't do it. >>> >>>I would go into all the reasons, but I have to go to bed in the next hour... >> >>Are you unhappy with the product itself, or the lack of support for it so >>far(operating system, compilers, etc.)? > >The FX51 runs like a champ. I have no complaints about any of my hardware. > >It's the lack of support, mainly. > >I got on the W2003-64 beta, and they sent my v.1069. Microsoft is on v.3200+ >now. :| 1069 and 3200 cannot be directly compared -- different algorithm are used for calculating version # from build date for different products. Thanks, Eugene >The only good news I've heard since getting this system, is that Intel is going >to have their Xeon64's. Cause that means I might get to compile something on >this machine, before summer, in 64-bit.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.