Author: Tim Foden
Date: 07:07:28 02/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2004 at 09:46:05, Uri Blass wrote:
>On February 19, 2004 at 08:49:25, Tim Foden wrote:
>
>>Full analysis: GLC 3.01.1.2, 96MB Hash, AXP 2.1GHz:
>>
>> Game stage: Endgame
>> Current eval: 0.391
>> Ply Time Score Nodes Principal variation
>> 5 0.000 +1.086 7623 Rb5+ Nb6 2. Be4 Rxd8 3. Rxb6+ Kc8 {ht} 4. Rxh6
>> 5 0.020 +1.086 10654 Rb5+ Nb6 2. Be4 Rxd8 3. Rxb6+ Kc8 {ht} 4. Rxh6
>> 6 0.030 +1.045 18393 Rb5+ Nb6 2. Be4 Rxd8 3. Rxb6+ Kc8 4. Bf5+ Kc7 5.
>> Rxh6
>> 6 0.030 +1.045 27939 Rb5+ Nb6 2. Be4 Rxd8 3. Rxb6+ Kc8 4. Bf5+ Kc7 5.
>> Rxh6
>> Generating internal KP-K end-game table...
>> Done (0.141 secs)
>
>
>I see that you generate internal kp-k endgame during the search.
>Is it better than generating them when the program starts to run before
>searching?
Under Winboard with protocol version 2 it generates the table on initialisation
(after receiving the protover 2 command from winboard). Otherwise it just waits
until it is probed to generate it. As you can see it doesn't take very long, so
I'm not really that bothered either way. :)
>Does having big tables that are not used by the program hurt the speed of the
>program?
Not really, no.
Cheers, Tim.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.