Author: Slater Wold
Date: 07:26:30 02/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2004 at 01:32:52, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On February 19, 2004 at 01:21:36, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On February 19, 2004 at 01:12:57, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2004 at 00:59:17, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On February 19, 2004 at 00:33:08, Russell Reagan wrote: >>>> >>>>>Does Crafty run faster on Opteron or Itanium? >>>> >>>>From someone who just spent a bunch of money on a 64bit machine; don't do it. >>>> >>>>I would go into all the reasons, but I have to go to bed in the next hour... >>> >>>Are you unhappy with the product itself, or the lack of support for it so >>>far(operating system, compilers, etc.)? >> >>The FX51 runs like a champ. I have no complaints about any of my hardware. >> >>It's the lack of support, mainly. >> >>I got on the W2003-64 beta, and they sent my v.1069. Microsoft is on v.3200+ >>now. :| > >1069 and 3200 cannot be directly compared -- different algorithm are used for >calculating version # from build date for different products. > >Thanks, >Eugene In the W2003 64bit beta newsgroup, a Microsoft employee openly admitted that there was a version at least 3 months more current. However, Microsoft had made the descion to hold off releasing it, because they are putting all their time into XP SP2.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.