Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: This Position Has Never Occured in the Thousands of Yrs of Chess.

Author: William Penn

Date: 11:56:16 02/19/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2004 at 13:20:46, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:

>Mike,
>
>This is only an academic position. It will never occur unless your opponent
>wants you to win.
>
>TJ
>
>
>On February 18, 2004 at 09:54:00, Mike Hood wrote:
>
>>Shredder 8 gives the following information in "infinite analysis" mode, even
>>though I have all the 3/4/5-piece tablebases.
>>
>>[D] 4k3/8/8/8/8/8/3q4/4K3 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Shredder 8:
>>
>>1. = (0.00): 1.Kxd2
>>2. = (0.00): 1.Kf1 Kf7
>>
>>We get a small clue what is happening, when we look at Fritz 8's analysis of the
>>same position:
>>
>>Analysis by Fritz 8:
>>
>>1. = (0.00): 1.Kxd2
>>2. -+ (-10.66): 1.Kf1 Kd7
>>
>>This is the analysis after 10 seconds. If I wait a few minutes Fritz finds a
>>mate in 11. It looks like the tablebase engine goes on strike in positions which
>>are a potential transition to K-K.

This a very fundamental and important position, as are the positions where Rook
or Pawn are substituted for the Queen, which are also proven bugs here. These
positions may be very rare in actual games, but will occur frequently in
searches when analyzing endgame positions with the engine. If they are evaluated
incorrectly during those searches, then the best move predicted by Shredder 8 in
endgames may be incorrect.
[Have I got that right?]
WP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.