Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:48:36 02/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2004 at 05:48:40, Sedat wrote: > >I made a test about some engines with TaskInfo2002 4.0 on Win98. >I wanted to increase the hashsize to 128 mb hash of these engines but what a >pity that they did not go more than 2 mb: > >-Sos 4 For Arena >-Genius 7 >-DeepSjeng 1.5-not more than 16mb > >For Example -Sos 4 for Arena by TaskInfo2002 4.0 under win98: > >|Process| |% CPU| |LT % CPU| |Time| |Sw/s| |InMem KB| > >+ SOS-4_Arena.exe 100,00% 72,04% 0:34 42 2.588 > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >But under Windows XP Professional: > >-There is no any problem with the hashtable of these engines and any hashtable >its possible to increase ... > >For Example -Sos 4 for Arena by TaskInfo2002 4.0 under XP: > >|Process| |% CPU| |LT % CPU| |Time| |Sw/s| |InMem KB| > >+ SOS-4_Arena.exe 100,00% 72,04% 0:34 42 134.444 >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >So for ComputerChess is better Windows XP Professional !!! > >Regards, >Sedat I believe your conclusions are wrong. If the hash table is not in real memory, it is in virtual memory. No way you can get 100% cpu utilization with a lot of swapping/paging going on. Maybe the number you are looking at doesn't mean what you think it means?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.