Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:28:10 12/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 1998 at 04:14:59, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>>I played a series of 2 minute games in a tournament in CM6K, with the standard >>>settings and the Faber settings, and along with four other personalities, with a >>>few minor variations. I found that the CM6K standard settings won over the >>>second place personality by 6 points. The Faber settings personality came in >>>5/6. I was quit stunned. It was a 20 round tournament. >> >>Of course you can play with my settings again and again, but for the last time I >>make it public here: >> >>My Faber-settings ARE NOT GOOD for CM6000. >>They ARE GOOD for CM5X00 and probably CM4000. > > >I should have made it clear that I was using settings posted by I think Komputer >Korner for CM6K that had the heading Faber/Pilz for CM6K. Even though it did >state they were for CM5x00, I have now playing another 40 games between those >settings that were posted and the standard Settings, and those results were even >worse over 2 minute games. Even though there are still two games to go out of >the 40. Those settings which you say are not for CM6K is about 17 games behind. >So I can see why they are not for CM6K. They are just no good for this version. > >Sorry if I implied that you said they were settings for CM6K. I guess it was KK who brpought a bit confusion when giving my settings for anyone who asks for good settings for CM5500/CM6000. That is why I asked to add my and Walter Pilz' settings to the Resource center and make significantly clear that they are for CM4000-CM5500.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.