Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: STATIC EVAL TEST (provisional)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 13:51:56 02/21/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 21, 2004 at 12:39:19, Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz wrote:

>On February 21, 2004 at 12:29:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On February 21, 2004 at 10:28:20, Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz wrote:
>>
>>>Just a few positions that I've found here and there.
>>>I'm curious to see what several engines score statically for these.
>>>All constructive comments welcome.
>>>
>>>  Jaime
>>>
>>>
>>>[King's safety]
>>>
>>>r2k1b1r/2p2ppp/p3q3/2PpN3/Q2Pn3/4B3/PP3PPP/1R2R1K1 b - - ; id "KS-00001"
>>>2rqkb1r/p2p1p2/b1n2p2/1p2PN1p/8/8/PB3PPP/2RQR1K1 b k - ; id "KS-00002"
>>>rnb2b1r/ppp1k1pp/q7/3B4/4n3/4BN2/PPQ2PPP/3RK2R b K - ; id "KS-00003"
>>>1nr3k1/pp4rp/nq2p1p1/1b1pP3/3P1N2/1BP2Q2/PP3P2/K5RR w - - ; id "KS-00004"
>>>r3r1k1/1bq2p2/p1np1n1Q/1p3P2/4P3/P1N2BN1/1PP5/2KR4 b - - ; id "KS-00005"
>>>3r1r1k/pb3p1p/1pn2P2/2p1q2p/8/b2BQ3/P1P3PP/3R1R1K w - - ; id "KS-00006"
>>>3r1rk1/pb2np1p/1p4pQ/2p1qP1N/8/P2B4/1P4PP/3R1R1K w - - ; id "KS-00007"
>>>4rk1b/8/p3pPQ1/q3p3/1r1B4/1PN5/1P6/6RK b - - ; id "KS-00008"
>>>r2r3k/pp1b1pRp/2p1pP2/8/2PP1b2/P7/1PB2P1P/1K1R4 b - - ; id "KS-00009"
>>>rq3r2/3bp3/5pk1/2pPP3/ppn2P1Q/3R4/P3N1PP/6K1 w - - ; id "KS-00010"
>>>3r2k1/1pp2ppp/7r/1P2p2q/3P4/3P1PRn/1BQ1BP2/2R4K b - - ; id "KS-00011"
>>>r3qr2/1b1n2k1/5p2/1p1PpR1p/2p5/2P4P/1PBQ2P1/5R1K w - - ; id "KS-00012"
>>>r3qr1k/1b1n4/8/1p1Pp1Qp/2p5/2P4P/1PB3P1/5R1K w - - ; id "KS-00013"
>>>r1r3kb/pp2pp2/3p1npB/6Q1/2qNPNP1/3R1P2/2P1K3/7R b - - ; id "KS-00014"
>>>1n3rk1/Q5p1/3bq2p/1p6/3P1P2/5bP1/PP1B1P1P/RN3RK1 w - - ; id "KS-00015"
>>
>>I looked in the king safety position and I think that they are not good.
>>In all of them the side with the material advantage has bad position.
>>
>>
>>Not also that my evaluation is dependent on the path so I cannot tell the exact
>>evaluation that my program will have if it has to evaluate the relevant position
>>as leaf positions.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Maybe you're right.
>We'll find out when we have more information.
>Could you send yours if it's not a problem?
>Thank you,
>
>  Jaime

It is not so simple for me because my evaluation does not depends only on the
leaf position and without previous moves I have not complete evaluation but only
partial evaluation.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.