Author: Andre van Ark
Date: 05:41:04 02/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2004 at 07:59:47, Mike S. wrote: >On February 22, 2004 at 07:16:30, Andre van Ark wrote: > >The only thing what has been edited after (part of) the game, is that I added >>the *****. > >Didn't you read my whole posting? I can hardly guess how such a misunderstanding >would be possible. I meant it seems to be a log not of a normal game, but from a >game/analysis situation where *moves haven been taken back* and replaced by >other moves etc., which I've illustrated very clear IMO. You should run a >*normal* game, played move by move continueosly, and then check the log of that >for new game commands. > >Then report again please. > >You should be a bit more careful before talking of disadvantages. > >Regards, >M.Scheidl Mike S, This was a *normal* game *NO moves haven been taken back* Try it yourself. 1. Use Ruffian 2.0.0 under the CB Gui as UCI engine. 2. Play a couple of *normal* games on the CB-server. 3. Check the logs. Then, give your explanation of the logs and and your point of view if Ruffian has a DISADVANTAGE or not. The Gui I used was the Shredder 8 Gui. If you don't have Ruffian 2.0.0, you could ask Kurt U. if he likes to do the test. Regards, André
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.