Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I meant edited GAME (not the log)

Author: Mike S.

Date: 06:00:10 02/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 22, 2004 at 08:41:04, Andre van Ark wrote:

>This was a *normal* game *NO moves haven been taken back*

I understand. - Meanwhile I've found another possible explanation of why move
pairs (like Qg3 a5 in the example) seem to vanish. I can only guess this is the
predicted, or ponder continuation, but the opponent has continued with another
move than expected. So it looks in the log as if moves had been taken back, but
actually these have never been played.

I wonder if not all UCI engines would be affected by those new game commands in
between (?).

Regards,
M.Scheidl




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.