Author: Roy Brunjes
Date: 09:32:54 02/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2004 at 04:02:32, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >[D]rnb1k2r/pp1pp1bp/6p1/2pn2B1/8/2NB1N2/PqPQ2PP/1R2K2R w Kkq - 0 11 >Reti,R - Euwe,M (Amsterdam 1920) >Position before 11.Nxd5!! (or ?!) > > >[Event "Amsterdam m"] >[Site "Amsterdam"] >[Date "1920.??.??"] >[Round "2"] >[White "Reti, Richard"] >[Black "Euwe, Max"] >[Result "1-0"] >[ECO "A83"] >[PlyCount "33"] >[EventDate "1920.??.??"] > >1. d4 f5 2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 g6 5. f3 exf3 6. Nxf3 Bg7 7. Bd3 c5 8. d5 >Qb6 9. Qd2 Qxb2 10. Rb1 Nxd5 11. Nxd5 Qxb1+ 12. Kf2 Qxh1 13. Bxe7 d6 14. Bxd6 >Nc6 15. Bb5 Bd7 16. Bxc6 bxc6 17. Qe2+ 1-0 CM9000 running my very strong personality called GM_Active gives the following line after a LONG think on my AMD XP 1800 (64 MB hashtables). It is interesting to me that it thinks that Qxh1 is a bad idea and opts for Qb2 in the line. Not sure if it would really play that though -- just in the PV it shows it prefers Qb2. Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:02 1/9 -0.14 561384 11.Rxb2 Bxc3 12.O-O Bxd2 13.Nxd2 Rf8 14.Rxf8+ Kxf8 15.Be4 e6 16.c4 0:07 1/10 0.01 1699161 11.Rxb2 Bxc3 12.O-O Bxd2 13.Nxd2 Rf8 14.Rxf8+ Kxf8 15.Ne4 d6 16.Bc4 Nb4 17.Bh6+ Ke8 0:19 2/11 -0.02 4661009 11.Rxb2 Bxc3 12.O-O Bxd2 13.Nxd2 Rf8 14.Ne4 Nc6 15.Rxf8+ Kxf8 16.c4 Ndb4 17.Nxc5 Nxd3 18.Nxd3 1:29 2/11 0.63 21414376 11.Nxd5 Qxb1+ 12.Kf2 Qb2 13.Bxe7 Bd4+ 14.Ke2 Nc6 15.Qg5 d6 16.Bxd6 Be6 17.a4 Kd7 3:51 3/12 0.84 54957776 11.Nxd5 Qxb1+ 12.Kf2 Qb2 13.Nxe7 Bd4+ 14.Kg3 Be5+ 15.Nxe5 Qxe5+ 16.Bf4 Qxe7 17.Re1 Qe6 18.Rxe6+ dxe6 19.Qc3 O-O 20.Qxc5 48:58 5/14 1.39 744913975 11.Nxd5 Qxb1+ 12.Kf2 Qb2 13.Nxe7 Bd4+ 14.Kg3 Be5+ 15.Nxe5 Qxe5+ 16.Kh3 Qe6+ 17.g4 d5 18.Nxc8 O-O 19.Ne7+ Kh8 20.Qc3+ d4 21.Qxc5 Rf3+ 22.Kh4 Nd7 23.Qxd4+ Ne5 Roy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.