Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: how many years do we need to practically solve chess?

Author: Mark Young

Date: 21:12:30 02/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 23, 2004 at 00:00:37, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>On February 22, 2004 at 08:27:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>I am not talking about situation when we prove theretical result but about
>>situation when all comp-comp games at 120/40 time control between top programs
>>are drawn.
>>
>>My guess is that we need more than 20 years but less than 50 years to achieve
>>that target.
>>
>>What is your opinion?
>
>For humans, everything seems to be already a draw at super-Grandmaster level.
>Take a look at the Linares games...

This is because super-Grandmaster still make to many mistakes in winning
positions. Look at the game Leko - Kasparov for example

>
>But for machines it is a whole different story. Count the number of draws in
>Graz WCCC, surprisingly low.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.