Author: Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz
Date: 04:43:14 02/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
>Hi Jaime, > >that sounds good. I would see a bit more positions, where the material is equal >for both sides. And more endgame positions would be also great, but table base >positions like EG-2 are not so good, because my engine and i think many others >have deleted or never implemented such knowledge in there engines, because of tb >access. But thanks anyway. I know, but still it can give people something to think about, because it's not generally a good idea to go to an edgame with only a h-pawn (or a-pawn) without having its king in the right position, or without enough pieces to help, etc... Surely we can remove many positions, if they're not very useful I've added yours anyway. Thanks, Jaime > >Andreas > >Here some nice positions: > >king safety: >6k1/1pq1rbp1/p1nb3p/7R/3P3Q/2PB1NP1/3B1P1P/6K1 w - - 0 27 ;bm 27.Rh5 > >endgame: >8/8/8/7R/5pr1/2R1p1k1/6r1/7K w - - 0 74 >8/5pp1/4p2p/3k3P/1p1P2P1/1P1K1P2/1P6/8 b - - bm g5 > >imbalances: >8/6k1/p3Q3/2p1p2K/P1Pb1r1P/8/2r4P/8 b - - 0 47 ;c0 "perpetual check" >6k1/5pp1/8/8/4R2Q/q7/8/K7 w - - 0 1 ;c0 "perpetual check"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.