Author: Klaus Friedel
Date: 10:40:00 02/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2004 at 11:17:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 23, 2004 at 06:59:34, Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Hopefully, if geocities is ok you can download all the results I have so far >>here: >> >>http://www.geocities.com/jaime_bvr/EVAL.xls >> >>Otherwise and anyway, I'll paste the table at the bottom of this page, because >>it's a big table, and maybe it'll look too messy. >> >>I'm glad many people found it useful, so I've decided to compile a much bigger >>list with a few hundred of positions this time (added to the ones we already >>have), and I'll post it here before wednedsay. >> >>Please, remember to give the score in pawns and always for the side to move, and >>in a single column, so it's easier to copy&paste in Excel, etc... > >Why "always for side to move"?? That makes it (IMHO) more confusing. Most >chess analysis is always with respect to the white side, and many current chess >programs now produce search scores that same way. I don't know if I started the >"+=good for white" revolution, but I've been doing it for a long time and it >makes the output much more understandable... > I support the "white side" view. Regards, Klaus.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.