Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 10:40:13 02/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2004 at 13:07:19, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 23, 2004 at 12:27:51, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>But in version 2.1.0 try Per-Ola improvments and after my first impressions the >>latest improvments are maybe not good for games with longer time controls. I >>have not test Ruffian 2.1.0 with game in 1 or 5 minutes. >> >>Let us wait of the final results of my test vs. Shredder 8.0. >> >>Best >>Frank > >it needs much time to find out about "improvements". That's right! But version 2.1.0 is a try and why not! Ruffian 2.0.2 seems to be clearly stronger. I phone with Michael Jesdinsky for seconds. Michael testet the test versions of Ruffian too and after his results Ruffian solved the same number of positions but Ruffian 2.0.2 Beta test versions solved the positions in the half of the time. Ruffian 2.0.2 is in his opinion tactical clearly stronger as the 2.1.0 test version from 08.02.2004. This could explain my results with the released versions of Ruffian. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.