Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:47:58 02/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 2004 at 14:19:35, Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz wrote: >Ok, I know it was my choice, but several people have already pointed out that >it'd be a more sensible idea to give the scores for white (positive = white >wins, negative = black wins). >I thought that it'd be better to suggest this change now that we have just >started. > >Anyone has any strong argument against it? (hope not) > >I'll post at the bottom of this page the lastest table with some corrections, >and with all the scores changed for white.... and with Crafty's scores too! > >I'll upload the files to geocities as usual, but you know what geocities is >like.... > >Regards, > > Jaime > While you are formatting, you might do something about the program names. IE the formatting is wrapping the names to a second line, which makes this chart difficult to read. Worst case would be a code at the top, such as A, B, C for the program names, followed by a legend at the bottom, to avoid the wrapping.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.