Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 07:19:51 02/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 2004 at 09:32:08, martin fierz wrote: >On February 23, 2004 at 23:05:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 23, 2004 at 18:52:36, Geoff Westwood wrote: >> >>>Hi >>> >>>I was perusing the latest table of results, Crafty's static eval of 2 of the >>>passed pawn positions were interesting. >>> >>>Assuming I havent made a mistake in the cutting and pasting >>> >>>Position 1 >>>8/4k3/8/7P/1P6/3p4/4p3/4K3 b - -; id "PP-00004" >>> >>>[D]8/4k3/8/7P/1P6/3p4/4p3/4K3 b - - >>> >>>Crafty reckons this is +4.8 (good for white). This is rather clever as although >>>the black king could catch either of the white passed pawns, it cannot stop >>>both. Also blacks 2 advanced pawns cant do anything as the white king gobbles >>>them up easily. Only Crafty and Tinker understand this position statically. Any >>>tips on what the algorithm is to sort this one out ? >> >> >>This is the idea I have reported here before, pointed out (demanded to be fixed >>in fact) by a GM friend of mine. The idea is that the two separated pawns are >>better than the two connected passers. The king stops the two connected passers >>easily until the enemy king supports them, meanwhile the split passers walk on >>in... > >i don't like the generality of your statemtent here, but - it is a small price >to pay if it's right in most cases. which perhaps is the case. anyway, here's my >question: > >what does your static eval say for the black king on e6/e5/e4/e3 ? i wouldn't be >surprised if it got it wrong in some cases now... > >cheers > martin The question is always "what do you put in the search, what do you put in the eval" <shrug>. I have considered trying to do a really good KP eval; at the moment it is on the back-burner but I might return to it someday. anthony
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.