Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 11:16:15 02/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2004 at 13:49:05, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On February 24, 2004 at 16:10:12, Darren Rushton wrote: > >>[D]2rq1rk1/pb1pn1pp/1p2p3/2pn1p2/3P2P1/P1PBPN1P/1P1NQP1R/1K1R4 b - - 0 15 >> >>Alterman - Deep Sjeng >> >> >>Deep Sjeng is the only software which finds 15...Nxc3+!! > >The exact same thing has been posted at least 2 times before already. > >When I wrote this, Deep Sjeng 1.0 was current, and none of the professionals >or best amateurs could find the move in a short amount of time. It's now about >1 year later and other people have improved too, so some other programs can >also find it reasonably quickly. > >Deep Sjeng 1.5/1.6 are actually a bit slower than 1.0 on this position. > >I left the position there because it's still indicative of Deep Sjeng's style. > >And for the ones wondering, the sacrifice is 100% correct and crushing, just >analyze a bit further :) Actually the point isn't so much whether it is crushing or not, the point is that the right move may be played for the wrong reasons. The move might be good (objectively speaking forcing a win) but to be sure of that you need a fairly deep calculation, way too deep to be found in 1 second. When an engine makes the right move for the wrong reasons it is always cause for concern, IMO. Bottom line it is a matter of "style", not tactical abilities, hence I'm not sure I'd consider it a good test position. -S. >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.