Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous !

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 14:52:39 02/25/04

Go up one level in this thread

I honestly think that the SSDF rating list is a ridiculous comparison to human
rating, with Shredder 7.04 UCI rated over 2800 on a mere AMD Athlon 1.2 GHz. If
the initial purpose of the SSDF was to assign computer programs with rating
similar to human rating, then the target is way too far off. The SSDF either
lower it rating by 100 points or it is time to keep the same rating as it is but
start testing with an AMD  XP 3200.

Jorge

• SSDF ratings complaints over the *years* (with links and excerpts) Albert Silver 06:45:00 02/26/04
• Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply a rating list Mike S. 00:40:52 02/26/04
  • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply a rating list Jorge Pichard 13:31:35 02/26/04
    • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply a rating list Uri Blass 15:17:07 02/26/04
      • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply a rating list Mike S. 22:19:10 02/26/04
    • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply a rating list Jorge Pichard 14:05:10 02/26/04
• Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! Uri Blass 15:17:22 02/25/04
  • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! Dann Corbit 15:22:37 02/25/04
    • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! Uri Blass 19:42:35 02/25/04
      • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba 04:29:56 02/26/04
        • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! Uri Blass 04:45:21 02/26/04
          • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba 05:05:32 02/26/04
            • Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! Uri Blass 06:56:22 02/26/04
• Re: The SSDF Rating List is simply ridiculous ! Dann Corbit 15:03:15 02/25/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.