Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:22:37 02/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2004 at 18:17:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 25, 2004 at 17:52:39, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I honestly think that the SSDF rating list is a ridiculous comparison to human >>rating, with Shredder 7.04 UCI rated over 2800 on a mere AMD Athlon 1.2 GHz. If >>the initial purpose of the SSDF was to assign computer programs with rating >>similar to human rating, then the target is way too far off. The SSDF either >>lower it rating by 100 points or it is time to keep the same rating as it is but >>start testing with an AMD XP 3200. >> >>Jorge > >lowering it by 100 elo is not going to help >The only way is to pay GM's to play some matches of 40 games against chess >programs and to have rating of GM's in the ssdf list. > >If the ssdf suggest total prizes of 200,000$ for the best fide player who agree >to play against computers under controlled conditions when the best player >against computers gets 100,000$ second place gets 60,000$ and third place gets >40,000$ when they have to play 200 games in a year of 120/40 then maybe we are >going to see some interesting stuff. > >We only need sponsors. I don't think it is enough. The data will only be useful if at least 30 games are played by one GM (bare minimum). So more than a month to do it. In the same time frame, I think they will earn more just in FIDE tournaments.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.