Author: Peter Berger
Date: 15:29:45 02/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2004 at 17:04:11, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: > 46 Chess Tiger 14.9 Palm m515 16MB 42MHz 2101 69 -74 100 39% 2180 > 47 Atlanta SH7000 20 MHz 2085 28 -27 687 67% 1958 > 48 Star Sapphire 2029 69 -69 103 50% 2029 That's a *very* surprising result for me, even with the huge error margins. I take it the Star Sapphire is identical to the Star Diamond when it is about strength - is this a correct assumption? I am pretty sure that the Star Diamond is stronger than Chess Tiger 14.9 on an over-clocked Palm 515. Maybe the choice of opponents had some impact here btw ?! - it would be very interesting to have them play each other for the next list. Another question: Chessmaster 9000 SKR has been tested inofficially by Tony Hedlund - could we have the "would-be"-SSDF ranking for it? TIA, Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.