Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 15:36:35 02/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Thoralf, that was fast... :) >> On the other hand I do not know how they did test it. Which book was used > Ruffian Leiden, if I understand the instructions correctly. >> the main question: did they use Ruffian as UCI or WB. In UCI-mode >> booklearning is not working -> for matches like they are played at SSDF >> booklearning is very important. >Ruffian 2.0.0 has been tested as a Winboard engine. outch, now it gets complicated to explain Ruffians result... :) [FUNmode ON] So I start with the usual list: (Mark what you think is important... :) ( ) you played with the wrong time control ( ) you played against the wrong opponents ( ) you played against too many opponents ( ) you played against too less opponents ( ) the engine did not like your PC ( ) the weather was bad - this explains the result ( ) you played too less games ( ) you played too much games ( ) you played at the wrong days of the year ( ) you did not use the correct set of TBs (whatever correct is) ( ) you did not restart the PC after every game ( ) you DID restart the PC after every game ( ) it is too cold in your country ( ) it is too hot in your country ( ) you were bought ( ) you ignored the money you get ( ) you $%&ยง*#$% duuuh... ( ) add some more... :) I love this list... :))) [FUNmode OFF] Greets, Thomas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.