Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: It was true when it was written

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 16:44:46 02/25/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 25, 2004 at 14:16:15, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On February 25, 2004 at 13:49:05, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On February 24, 2004 at 16:10:12, Darren Rushton wrote:
>>
>>>[D]2rq1rk1/pb1pn1pp/1p2p3/2pn1p2/3P2P1/P1PBPN1P/1P1NQP1R/1K1R4 b - - 0 15
>>>
>>>Alterman - Deep Sjeng
>>>
>>>
>>>Deep Sjeng is the only software which finds 15...Nxc3+!!
>>
>>The exact same thing has been posted at least 2 times before already.
>>
>>When I wrote this, Deep Sjeng 1.0 was current, and none of the professionals
>>or best amateurs could find the move in a short amount of time. It's now about
>>1 year later and other people have improved too, so some other programs can
>>also find it reasonably quickly.
>>
>>Deep Sjeng 1.5/1.6 are actually a bit slower than 1.0 on this position.
>>
>>I left the position there because it's still indicative of Deep Sjeng's style.
>>
>>And for the ones wondering, the sacrifice is 100% correct and crushing, just
>>analyze a bit further :)
>
>Actually the point isn't so much whether it is crushing or not, the point is
>that the right move may be played for the wrong reasons.
>
>The move might be good (objectively speaking forcing a win) but to be sure of
>that you need a fairly deep calculation, way too deep to be found in 1 second.
>
>When an engine makes the right move for the wrong reasons it is always cause for
>concern, IMO.
>
>Bottom line it is a matter of "style", not tactical abilities, hence I'm not
>sure I'd consider it a good test position.


Let me quote a very strong and famous chessplayer who regrettably has died.

When i had an analytical look at a position explaining why i had played it with
all kind of plans and reasons why i played it, he told me this: "The plans and
reasons are unimportant. Each position is unique. The only thing that matters is
which move you play here".

I also remember Stefan Meyer Kahlen complaining in paderborn2004 that the
mainlines of Shredder in the game Diep-Shredder sucked.

Of course i had to remind him that what mattered is that he was winning there.
It's the first move that matters...

So please don't post in the same style like Uri, just post whether you find the
move or not :)

>-S.
>>--
>>GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.