Author: Volker Pittlik
Date: 23:16:38 02/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2004 at 18:36:35, Thomas Mayer wrote: ... >>> On the other hand I do not know how they did test it. Which book was used > >> Ruffian Leiden, if I understand the instructions correctly. ... >>Ruffian 2.0.0 has been tested as a Winboard engine. > >outch, now it gets complicated to explain Ruffians result... :) Applying Occam's Razor my explanation is: Ruffian isn't that strong as it has been announced. Regards Volker P.S.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.