Author: Volker Pittlik
Date: 06:21:00 02/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 07:40:57, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On February 26, 2004 at 02:16:38, Volker Pittlik wrote: ... >>Applying Occam's Razor my explanation is: Ruffian isn't that strong as it has >>been announced. ... >what is your opinion? My opinion is that the above explanation is the easiest to explain Ruffian's SSDF rating. >In your own tournament Ruffian won in front of Shredder! Yes, but that is no contradiction at all. Look at the final standing especially at the error bars: Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws min. Rating max. Rating 1 Ruffian_Leiden 2724 95 107 34 73.50% 2547 35.30% 2617 2819 2 Shredder-704 2712 96 88 34 72.10% 2547 44.10% 2624 2808 I played much less game than the SSDF. According to my results Ruffian's "true rating" could be ~200 points better than Shredder's or ~200 points worst. More details here: http://www.pittlik.de/fs-twn.html Volker
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.