Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 07:09:04 02/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 10:02:09, Volker Pittlik wrote: >On February 26, 2004 at 09:49:14, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On February 26, 2004 at 09:21:00, Volker Pittlik wrote: >> >>Hi Volker, >> >>>My opinion is that the above explanation is the easiest to explain Ruffian's >>>SSDF rating. >> >>But with this explanation we cann't anything make! > >One possibility is to accept it. The other possibility is to search the reason! Much more intersting if the results completly different! But of course, I accept every results by users or SSDF! Not only the once results are important for me ... you can see I saw your results too. >Welcome to reality Let us discuss about it if I have more results. It seems that the most here have no interest to search the reason and if we have a Ruffian version with clearly results and if Ruffian then clearly better the users will write: ... you know this :-) Best Frank
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.