Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 07:52:08 02/26/04

On February 26, 2004 at 10:47:31, Volker Pittlik wrote:

>On February 26, 2004 at 10:09:04, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>
>...
>>The other possibility is to search the reason!
>
>The reason is that Ruffian is not that strong as you announced.
>
>But this discussion is repetitive.

No, I have since month the same results and over night no person edit other
results in my database :-))

Yes, this discussion is repetitive!
More interesting if we have the excatly reason for the results by one of the
SSDF testers.

Best
Frank

Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 George Tsavdaris 09:36:03 02/26/04
- Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Frank Quisinsky 09:59:02 02/26/04
Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Volker Pittlik 08:50:00 02/26/04
- Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Frank Quisinsky 09:31:10 02/26/04
  - Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Volker Pittlik 00:59:59 02/27/04
    - Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Frank Quisinsky 02:43:52 02/27/04
      - Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Volker Pittlik 10:25:13 02/27/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Uri Blass 11:23:07 02/27/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Volker Pittlik 13:18:37 02/27/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Frank Quisinsky 13:22:07 02/27/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Volker Pittlik 03:09:33 02/28/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Uri Blass 03:39:00 02/28/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Frank Quisinsky 05:45:34 02/28/04
        
        Re: SSDF Rating List 2004-02-25 Frank Quisinsky 13:18:35 02/27/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.