Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 09:31:10 02/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 11:50:00, Volker Pittlik wrote: Hello Volker, >On February 26, 2004 at 10:52:08, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >... >>No, I have since month the same results and over night no person edit other >>results in my database :-)) > >If you have really done such overwhelming tests why do I have 4 different >Ruffians meanwhile and can't be sure which the strongest? Ruffian 2.0.0 (improved version from Ruffian Leiden) Ruffian Leiden (version from the tournament in Leiden) Users asked for the Leiden version and we give the version on the commercial CD. Ruffian 2.0.2 (bugfix version of Ruffian 2.0.0) Ruffian 2.1.0 (improved version of Ruffian 2.0.0 / 2.0.2). Two versions, because it need a lot of time to check the improvments. It's a little bit service for the Ruffian customers to give the latest version. Volker, I have with ponder = off after 170 games vs. Shredder 7.04 47,4% Version 2.0.2 now with 40/20 and ponder = off after 40 games 19.5 : 20.5. For me +- the same results. But all ponder=on resuls seems to be bad. Leo, SSDF, my own results vs. Shredder ... Furthermore I believe that version 2.0.2 is the strongest Ruffian. But this are my impressions and you can see that an other person wrote here that 2.1.0 is stronger in blitz. I can only test on two systems. More I cann't do! >... >>More interesting if we have the excatly reason for the results by one of the >>SSDF testers. > >You have been told. More than once. Best Frank
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.