Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 09:36:03 02/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 10:52:08, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On February 26, 2004 at 10:47:31, Volker Pittlik wrote: > >>On February 26, 2004 at 10:09:04, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>... >>>The other possibility is to search the reason! I can give you a reason: Ruffian 2.0 lost from Deep Fritz 7 on a K6-2 computer and didn't won Fritz 5.32 on P200 MHz with a crushing score and as it played only with 4 opponents it's rating was this. Be patient until next list and you will certainly see Ruffian have a +87 points increase. >> >>The reason is that Ruffian is not that strong as you announced. >> >>But this discussion is repetitive. > >No, I have since month the same results and over night no person edit other >results in my database :-)) > >Yes, this discussion is repetitive! >More interesting if we have the excatly reason for the results by one of the >SSDF testers. >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.