Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 09:59:02 02/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 12:36:03, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On February 26, 2004 at 10:52:08, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On February 26, 2004 at 10:47:31, Volker Pittlik wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 2004 at 10:09:04, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>> >>>... >>>>The other possibility is to search the reason! > > I can give you a reason: Ruffian 2.0 lost from Deep Fritz 7 on a K6-2 computer >and didn't won Fritz 5.32 on P200 MHz with a crushing score and as it played >only with 4 opponents it's rating was this. Be patient until next list and you >will certainly see Ruffian have a +87 points increase. Hi, yes, it's possible! But the results against Fritz are very good! Try Ruffian 2.0.2 without ponder on your favorite GUI vs. Fritz! Or Fritz 5.32 vs. Ruffian 2.0.2! I am sure that Ruffian will killed the good and old Fritz :-) I believe more that Ruffian have a ponder problem! This could be explain the results from Leo, SSDF and my results on my Dual system. The other possiblity is that Ruffian is with more time not so strong. But this I cann't know after the results in positions test. Best Frank >>>The reason is that Ruffian is not that strong as you announced. >>> >>>But this discussion is repetitive. >> >>No, I have since month the same results and over night no person edit other >>results in my database :-)) >> >>Yes, this discussion is repetitive! >>More interesting if we have the excatly reason for the results by one of the >>SSDF testers. >>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.