Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 03:32:19 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 17:02:55, enrico carrisco wrote: [snip] >I don't feel that too few games is an excuse at all. Anyone understanding >statistical signifigance would agree. In fact, one shouldn't even try to >extract indicators until at least 100 games (and even then, it's dangerous.) > >Those running short matches and extrapolating which engine is superior would >probably find more exacting results using tarot cards or calling Psychic Friends >Network. > >-elc. You don't understand human beings very well it seems. Most couldn't care less about correct answers. Most are happy enough to get _some_ answer. That's why religion works. ;) [and politics, I might add] Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.