Author: Bigler David
Date: 05:36:52 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2004 at 08:26:56, Geert van der Wulp wrote: >On February 27, 2004 at 08:08:07, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 27, 2004 at 08:02:08, Geert van der Wulp wrote: >> >>>On February 27, 2004 at 07:56:28, Nick Rowe wrote: >>> >>>>On February 27, 2004 at 07:07:47, Thorsten Greiner wrote: >>>> >>>>>>I am interested in knowing which engines GM's use for evaluation of their games. >>>>>>Anyone has info about that? >>>>> >>>>>I tend to think that most use a rather complicated, carbon-based neural network >>>>>which has been trained for many years using advanced learning techniques. :-) >>>> >>>>Probably most high 90% use Fritz in some capacity. Not to say that it is best, >>>>but it is certainly good and has been around a long time and is well known. >>>>Junior, Hiarcs, and Shredder will also be used by a number. shredder 8, though >>>>i'm starting to believe is truly the best overall i used to be a holdout for >>>>Fritz, but i think the mantle has clearly passed to shredder with the release of >>>>shredder 8 >>> >>>But WHY do you believe this is the case? I am not looking for the strongest >>>program, any one of these programs will beat the shit out of me. >> >>This is not important. >>Every car is going to move faster than you. >> >>Does it mean that you do not care if someone tells you that the fastest speed >>that some car can go is only 60 km/hour? >> >>People do not buy new cars in order to compete with them and people usually also >>do not buy new chess programs in order to compete with them. >> >>Uri > >Ehhhhhhhhhhh, your point is ............. ? > >You say exactly the same as I do, but you present it as if your point of view is >contradicting with mine. You must be a politician, or become one. > >You seem to be extremely talented, as I have no idea why you respond to unasked >questions and give answers that seem to contain information but are completely >empty on more accurate inspection. Besides that, you compare our points of view >with a product that is known by the masses. > >You must be someone who can talk for hours without saying anything and you are >probably able to avoid certain topics with woolly language. > >Regards, > >Geert > >p.s. Let me make my question clear one more time. I am looking for a chess >program that I can use to analyse games. I want it to be able to think not only >by brute-force, but also have a lot of "intuition". I think it is interesting to >know which engine GM's use. Hi, No engines have intuition. If you want to use a "human-like" engine, maybe Hiarcs 9 is interesting. I think that Fritz is the worst in "human-like" style. I find that Shredder 8 is also good in this sense! Regards
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.