Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:41:41 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2004 at 22:27:51, Chessfun wrote:
>On February 26, 2004 at 21:45:40, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On February 26, 2004 at 13:40:11, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>On February 26, 2004 at 12:04:26, Derek Paquette wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 26, 2004 at 09:14:02, Bigler David wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Why is there so much difference between Junior 8 and Deep Junior 8 ?
>>>>>ChessBase says that there are the same engine !
>>>>>
>>>>>regards
>>>>Dj8 is 10% slower on 1 processor than J8, and since this is only a 1200mhz, that
>>>>is probably the difference in a dozen or so ELO
>>>
>>>Actually I think Amir wrote 5% and the difference is in the +- of both engines.
>>>
>>>Sarah.
>>
>>Umm, I tried seeing your rating lists on your pages and ran into a small
>>problem. I went throught "The Best" as suggested by the scrolling banner, but
>>the lists are dated 2002 and 2001 respectively.
>>
>> Albert
>
>I know, I'm a little slow when it comes to updating webpages.
>Here is my current list.
>
>Minimum 70 games to qualify.
>All 3,4 and 5 piece tablebases.
>Native books where made, general.ctg where not.
>Majority 9000+ games over 60 mins.
>Games are autoplayed ponder=on and single PC ponder=off.
>AMD XP 2600+
>
> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
>
> 1 Shredder 8 : 2723 44 47 150 67.3 % 2598 37.3 %
> 2 Deep Fritz 8 : 2687 45 42 170 61.2 % 2608 36.5 %
> 3 Hiarcs 9 : 2641 46 37 190 55.5 % 2603 35.3 %
> 4 Fritz 8 : 2634 29 23 460 56.0 % 2593 38.5 %
> 5 Deep Fritz 7 : 2633 32 26 374 56.3 % 2589 36.6 %
> 6 Deep Junior 8 : 2631 43 39 210 57.1 % 2581 28.6 %
> 7 Tiger 15 normal : 2629 33 24 377 54.9 % 2595 42.4 %
> 8 Shredder 7 : 2629 37 31 290 55.3 % 2592 32.8 %
> 9 Junior 8 : 2627 46 35 200 54.8 % 2594 36.5 %
> 10 Tiger 15 gambit : 2627 48 44 163 58.0 % 2571 31.3 %
> 11 Shredder 7.04 : 2615 37 28 320 53.8 % 2589 34.4 %
> 12 Shredder Paderbo : 2613 40 31 262 54.0 % 2586 34.7 %
> 13 Fritz 7 : 2611 22 19 742 57.9 % 2556 38.9 %
> 14 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2605 37 56 150 49.0 % 2612 40.7 %
> 15 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2604 21 16 852 56.0 % 2562 43.4 %
> 16 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2602 21 16 878 57.3 % 2550 41.8 %
> 17 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2600 49 36 162 58.0 % 2544 44.4 %
> 18 Deep Fritz : 2589 26 20 605 54.1 % 2560 36.9 %
> 19 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2584 46 32 220 51.4 % 2575 38.2 %
> 20 Ruffian Leiden2003 : 2583 38 54 160 48.4 % 2594 38.1 %
> 21 List 504 : 2578 28 45 230 48.9 % 2585 46.5 %
>
> 54 Crafty 18.08 : 2461 44 46 159 37.4 % 2550 35.8 %
> 55 Crafty 18.10 : 2452 44 49 141 37.6 % 2540 39.7 %
> 56 Fritz 4.01 : 2437 35 41 217 41.5 % 2497 36.9 %
> 57 SOS : 2423 49 42 178 34.6 % 2534 27.5 %
> 58 Fritz 5.00 : 2400 42 40 187 34.5 % 2512 36.9 %
> 59 Crafty 17.07 : 2389 69 66 74 34.5 % 2501 33.8 %
> 60 Crafty 17.11 : 2381 62 59 87 31.6 % 2515 37.9 %
> 61 Junior 4.6 : 2370 42 42 163 31.9 % 2502 41.7 %
>
>Sarah.
Thanks. I have a question and a request. The question is whether the Ruffian
Leiden is the 2.1.0 version Í see many reporting enthusiastic results for. The
other is whether you could include List 5.12, Aristarch 4.41 and Crafty 19.11 in
your tests as I'm quite curious to know how they fare. Thanks again for the
great job. Peace.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.