Author: Chessfun
Date: 06:50:16 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2004 at 09:41:41, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 26, 2004 at 22:27:51, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 26, 2004 at 21:45:40, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On February 26, 2004 at 13:40:11, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On February 26, 2004 at 12:04:26, Derek Paquette wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 26, 2004 at 09:14:02, Bigler David wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Why is there so much difference between Junior 8 and Deep Junior 8 ? >>>>>>ChessBase says that there are the same engine ! >>>>>> >>>>>>regards >>>>>Dj8 is 10% slower on 1 processor than J8, and since this is only a 1200mhz, that >>>>>is probably the difference in a dozen or so ELO >>>> >>>>Actually I think Amir wrote 5% and the difference is in the +- of both engines. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>Umm, I tried seeing your rating lists on your pages and ran into a small >>>problem. I went throught "The Best" as suggested by the scrolling banner, but >>>the lists are dated 2002 and 2001 respectively. >>> >>> Albert >> >>I know, I'm a little slow when it comes to updating webpages. >>Here is my current list. >> >>Minimum 70 games to qualify. >>All 3,4 and 5 piece tablebases. >>Native books where made, general.ctg where not. >>Majority 9000+ games over 60 mins. >>Games are autoplayed ponder=on and single PC ponder=off. >>AMD XP 2600+ >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >> >> 1 Shredder 8 : 2723 44 47 150 67.3 % 2598 37.3 % >> 2 Deep Fritz 8 : 2687 45 42 170 61.2 % 2608 36.5 % >> 3 Hiarcs 9 : 2641 46 37 190 55.5 % 2603 35.3 % >> 4 Fritz 8 : 2634 29 23 460 56.0 % 2593 38.5 % >> 5 Deep Fritz 7 : 2633 32 26 374 56.3 % 2589 36.6 % >> 6 Deep Junior 8 : 2631 43 39 210 57.1 % 2581 28.6 % >> 7 Tiger 15 normal : 2629 33 24 377 54.9 % 2595 42.4 % >> 8 Shredder 7 : 2629 37 31 290 55.3 % 2592 32.8 % >> 9 Junior 8 : 2627 46 35 200 54.8 % 2594 36.5 % >> 10 Tiger 15 gambit : 2627 48 44 163 58.0 % 2571 31.3 % >> 11 Shredder 7.04 : 2615 37 28 320 53.8 % 2589 34.4 % >> 12 Shredder Paderbo : 2613 40 31 262 54.0 % 2586 34.7 % >> 13 Fritz 7 : 2611 22 19 742 57.9 % 2556 38.9 % >> 14 Ruffian 2.0.0 : 2605 37 56 150 49.0 % 2612 40.7 % >> 15 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2604 21 16 852 56.0 % 2562 43.4 % >> 16 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2602 21 16 878 57.3 % 2550 41.8 % >> 17 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2600 49 36 162 58.0 % 2544 44.4 % >> 18 Deep Fritz : 2589 26 20 605 54.1 % 2560 36.9 % >> 19 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2584 46 32 220 51.4 % 2575 38.2 % >> 20 Ruffian Leiden2003 : 2583 38 54 160 48.4 % 2594 38.1 % >> 21 List 504 : 2578 28 45 230 48.9 % 2585 46.5 % >> >> 54 Crafty 18.08 : 2461 44 46 159 37.4 % 2550 35.8 % >> 55 Crafty 18.10 : 2452 44 49 141 37.6 % 2540 39.7 % >> 56 Fritz 4.01 : 2437 35 41 217 41.5 % 2497 36.9 % >> 57 SOS : 2423 49 42 178 34.6 % 2534 27.5 % >> 58 Fritz 5.00 : 2400 42 40 187 34.5 % 2512 36.9 % >> 59 Crafty 17.07 : 2389 69 66 74 34.5 % 2501 33.8 % >> 60 Crafty 17.11 : 2381 62 59 87 31.6 % 2515 37.9 % >> 61 Junior 4.6 : 2370 42 42 163 31.9 % 2502 41.7 % >> >>Sarah. > >Thanks. I have a question and a request. The question is whether the Ruffian >Leiden is the 2.1.0 version. No Ruffian Leiden 2003 is the version that came with Ruffian/Arena. Ruffian 2.1.0 came with an update for that program which is also where Ruffian 2.0.2 comes from or is also available from Lokasoft. > Í see many reporting enthusiastic results for. The >other is whether you could include List 5.12, Aristarch 4.41 and Crafty 19.11 in >your tests as I'm quite curious to know how they fare. Thanks again for the >great job. Peace. I will include both List 512 and Aristarch 4.41 when time permits. But I am first working on getting Crafty 19.06, Rebel 12.00.01, Hiarcs Bareev complete. It's also possible I may even run Ruffian 2.0.2 and Ruffian 2.1 prior to List and Aristarch. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.