Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 11:35:31 02/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2004 at 14:09:17, Graham Banks wrote: >I've often found that programs with a limited or narrow opening repertoire don't >perform as well as those with a larger repertoire, so there's something else to >throw into the melting pot! While using their narrow book, or while using a book from another program? Examples? According to Omid, his program performs fabulous against other programs as long as none of the programs use a book. Does that mean Falcon is the best program for analysis?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.