Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Linares should include the two best programs

Author: Derek Paquette

Date: 13:21:54 02/28/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 2004 at 04:21:32, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>The Linares should include the two best programs, shuch as Shredder 8 and Junior
>8 or newer version each year, but the best human will still win the match
>regardless if Shredder or Junior take first each year. I would almost guarantee
>that the human players without pressure from winning the event will perform
>better and probably end up in first and second each year. By including the two
>best programs each year we can compare the progress and increase strength of the
>programs and this will give us a better indication of where the two best
>programs stand in comparison to the elite world chess players.
>
>Since the Programs will only be there to create more pressure to the humans, and
>for us to compare their progress, the first place would be given to Kasparov and
>second to Kramnik as if the programs were not participating at all. Now because
>the inclusion of the programs, the result could be different in the sense that
>the programs would not offer an early draw unless it see no other way around.
>
>The final result could be like this:
>1 Shredder 8
>2 Kasparov,G
>3 Junior 8
>4 Kramnik,V
>5 Leko,P
>6 Shrivov,A
>7 Topalov,V
>8 Vallejo Pons,F

Depending on the hardware, and i'm guessing it would be a quad machine, i think
the programs would do quite well, with the GM's worrying and studying to play
other GM's, they have to worry about 2 different types of programs,

I think you'd see the programs in a 1,2 finishing position with the humans
behind, Especially vs rajabov, who is extremely aggressive, i think that would
end up hurting him



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.