Author: Luis Smith
Date: 16:53:24 02/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
>>Hi Uri, >> >> This is good news. Preliminary test results at g/15 AMD XP 2200+ 64 MB hash >>for all engines. >> >>Movei AMD XP 2200+ 384 MB RAM 2004 >> >>Movei 00_8_174 - Amateur 2.70 3.0 - 5.0 +2/-4/=2 37.50% >>Movei 00_8_174 - Frenzee 146 6.0 - 2.0 +5/-1/=2 75.00% >>Movei 00_8_174 - SlowChess 2.9 4.5 - 3.5 +4/-3/=1 56.25% >>Movei 00_8_174 - Tao 5.4 2.0 - 6.0 +1/-5/=2 25.00% >>Movei 00_8_174 - Quark 2.05b 5.0 - 3.0 +4/-2/=2 62.50% >>Movei 00_8_174 - Hagrid 0.7.56 8.0 - 0.0 +8/-0/=0 100.00% >>Movei 00_8_174 - Movei 00_8_173 3.0 - 5.0 +0/-2/=6 37.50% >> >>Hagrid is probably not a good opponent to test against Movei as it is a bit weak >>but I wanted to include a wide range of engines, and also Quark wasn't using its >>own book. >> >>Movei00_8_174 vs. Junior 5 at g/5 with no handicap resulted in 1 - 8 in favor of >>Junior and Movei only managed 2 draws so I stopped the tournament. They were >>both using Perfect5.ctg from Sedat's website. > >Thanks for your results. >Note that the only difference between 173 and 174 is removing a bug in >swap_list. >I guess that 173 was lucky to get 5-3 against 174 and I am not considering going >back to 173. > >8-0 against hagrid is a very good result >Hagrid is weak but not so weak to expect this result. >On the other hand losing 5-3 against amateur is a small disappointment. > >Uri I checked over the games vs. Hagrid and it seems there were 4 repeated games. I also checked over the games vs. Amateur and Movei had a 2.5/3.0 lead at the start of the match but then the rest of the games Movei made simple blunders it would have avoided if it had more time. I am redoing all the games at g/30 I will send the results when the test is finished. I also sent the games above to you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.