Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ICCF GM Nickel vs. 6 engines updated (first result Pluto-Nickel 1/2:1/2)

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 01:30:35 02/29/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 2004 at 16:18:49, Albert Silver wrote:

>I agree to a degree. I will note that I have a friend who is a postal Senior
>Master who is not stronger than 2100 OTB and uses no engines to analyze his
>games. I have another friend who was about 2200 Fide and who also reached a
>2500+ ICCF rating without engine use. These are at least two cases I can vouch
>for.
>
>                                         Albert

My little theory about postal and OTB skill differences is related to computer
chess. I tend to speculate that some players have a higher branching factor
concerning analytical skills, which precludes a high OTB rating while being no
significant hindrance in postal chess. The reverse scenario could possibly be a
result of speculative search. So maybe computers and humans are not that
different after all. This should apply to excuses for patzer skills as well.
Henceforth my favorite time control is one move a year.

Regards,
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.