Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 05:40:54 02/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2004 at 08:37:57, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On February 29, 2004 at 06:58:20, Sedat wrote:
>
>>On February 29, 2004 at 04:17:05, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>I think we can safely remove Ruffian from PRO engines, because there is now 4
>>>(!) versions after free 1.0.5, but it's unclear if ANY is better. This is not
>>>professional product!
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>-------------------------------
>>
>> - In my opinion Ruffian 2.0.0 is professional product,
>> - Ruffian 2.0.0 plays(in blitz)at strenght as Hiarcs 9,Deep Fritz 8,TheKing323
>> -In my Ratinlist Ruffian 2.0.0 scores 59 points better than Ruffian 1.0.5
>>
>>Please check the results at this url:
>>
>>http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/rating_all_4m_2s.html
>>
>>Sedat
>
>
>Have you tested Ruffian 2.0.0 versus Fritz 5.32 yet , or you want me to post it
>here? I have not posted it yet because of its poor performance against Fritz
>5.32. But the only setback is the Fritz 5.32 was using Shredder8.ctg, therefore,
>the result is invalid :-)
>
>Jorge
Hi Jorge
The (unknown) result vs Fritz 5.32 with shredder8.ctg is not 'invalid' but
nevertheless perhaps most surprising -:)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.