Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:09:49 02/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2004 at 08:37:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On February 29, 2004 at 06:58:20, Sedat wrote: > >>On February 29, 2004 at 04:17:05, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>I think we can safely remove Ruffian from PRO engines, because there is now 4 >>>(!) versions after free 1.0.5, but it's unclear if ANY is better. This is not >>>professional product! >>> >>>Jouni >>------------------------------- >> >> - In my opinion Ruffian 2.0.0 is professional product, >> - Ruffian 2.0.0 plays(in blitz)at strenght as Hiarcs 9,Deep Fritz 8,TheKing323 >> -In my Ratinlist Ruffian 2.0.0 scores 59 points better than Ruffian 1.0.5 >> >>Please check the results at this url: >> >>http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/rating_all_4m_2s.html >> >>Sedat > > >Have you tested Ruffian 2.0.0 versus Fritz 5.32 yet , or you want me to post it >here? I have not posted it yet because of its poor performance against Fritz >5.32. But the only setback is the Fritz 5.32 was using Shredder8.ctg, therefore, >the result is invalid :-) > >Jorge It means that Fritz5.32 was handicapped by a book that is clearly not tuned to hide Fritz's weaknesses. I bet that kasparov will perform worse if you tell him to use the book moves that karpov plays and it means that if you get bad results for Ruffian then your results are even more surprising. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.