Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:45:07 02/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2004 at 09:09:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>On February 29, 2004 at 08:37:57, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On February 29, 2004 at 06:58:20, Sedat wrote:
>>
>>>On February 29, 2004 at 04:17:05, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think we can safely remove Ruffian from PRO engines, because there is now 4
>>>>(!) versions after free 1.0.5, but it's unclear if ANY is better. This is not
>>>>professional product!
>>>>
>>>>Jouni
>>>-------------------------------
>>>
>>> - In my opinion Ruffian 2.0.0 is professional product,
>>> - Ruffian 2.0.0 plays(in blitz)at strenght as Hiarcs 9,Deep Fritz 8,TheKing323
>>> -In my Ratinlist Ruffian 2.0.0 scores 59 points better than Ruffian 1.0.5
>>>
>>>Please check the results at this url:
>>>
>>>http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/rating_all_4m_2s.html
>>>
>>>Sedat
>>
>>
>>Have you tested Ruffian 2.0.0 versus Fritz 5.32 yet , or you want me to post it
>>here? I have not posted it yet because of its poor performance against Fritz
>>5.32. But the only setback is the Fritz 5.32 was using Shredder8.ctg, therefore,
>>the result is invalid :-)
>>
>>Jorge
>
>It means that Fritz5.32 was handicapped by a book that is clearly not tuned to
>hide Fritz's weaknesses.
>
>I bet that kasparov will perform worse if you tell him to use the book moves
>that karpov plays and it means that if you get bad results for Ruffian then your
>results are even more surprising.
>
>Uri
Hi Uri
I think Jorge wanted to say that Fritz532 clearly won!!!
And therefore we can't speak about a book handicap.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.