Author: Chessfun
Date: 06:57:04 02/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2004 at 09:45:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On February 29, 2004 at 09:09:49, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 29, 2004 at 08:37:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On February 29, 2004 at 06:58:20, Sedat wrote: >>> >>>>On February 29, 2004 at 04:17:05, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>I think we can safely remove Ruffian from PRO engines, because there is now 4 >>>>>(!) versions after free 1.0.5, but it's unclear if ANY is better. This is not >>>>>professional product! >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>>------------------------------- >>>> >>>> - In my opinion Ruffian 2.0.0 is professional product, >>>> - Ruffian 2.0.0 plays(in blitz)at strenght as Hiarcs 9,Deep Fritz 8,TheKing323 >>>> -In my Ratinlist Ruffian 2.0.0 scores 59 points better than Ruffian 1.0.5 >>>> >>>>Please check the results at this url: >>>> >>>>http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/rating_all_4m_2s.html >>>> >>>>Sedat >>> >>> >>>Have you tested Ruffian 2.0.0 versus Fritz 5.32 yet , or you want me to post it >>>here? I have not posted it yet because of its poor performance against Fritz >>>5.32. But the only setback is the Fritz 5.32 was using Shredder8.ctg, therefore, >>>the result is invalid :-) >>> >>>Jorge >> >>It means that Fritz5.32 was handicapped by a book that is clearly not tuned to >>hide Fritz's weaknesses. >> >>I bet that kasparov will perform worse if you tell him to use the book moves >>that karpov plays and it means that if you get bad results for Ruffian then your >>results are even more surprising. >> >>Uri > > Hi Uri > I think Jorge wanted to say that Fritz532 clearly won!!! > And therefore we can't speak about a book handicap. > Kurt Uri, naturally could have meant that Fritz 5.32 was handicapped when released with general.ctg instead of a book that suited it's playing style as maybe Shredder8.ctg does. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.