Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:50:18 02/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 29, 2004 at 09:57:04, Chessfun wrote: >On February 29, 2004 at 09:45:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On February 29, 2004 at 09:09:49, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 29, 2004 at 08:37:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On February 29, 2004 at 06:58:20, Sedat wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 29, 2004 at 04:17:05, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I think we can safely remove Ruffian from PRO engines, because there is now 4 >>>>>>(!) versions after free 1.0.5, but it's unclear if ANY is better. This is not >>>>>>professional product! >>>>>> >>>>>>Jouni >>>>>------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> - In my opinion Ruffian 2.0.0 is professional product, >>>>> - Ruffian 2.0.0 plays(in blitz)at strenght as Hiarcs 9,Deep Fritz 8,TheKing323 >>>>> -In my Ratinlist Ruffian 2.0.0 scores 59 points better than Ruffian 1.0.5 >>>>> >>>>>Please check the results at this url: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/rating_all_4m_2s.html >>>>> >>>>>Sedat >>>> >>>> >>>>Have you tested Ruffian 2.0.0 versus Fritz 5.32 yet , or you want me to post it >>>>here? I have not posted it yet because of its poor performance against Fritz >>>>5.32. But the only setback is the Fritz 5.32 was using Shredder8.ctg, therefore, >>>>the result is invalid :-) >>>> >>>>Jorge >>> >>>It means that Fritz5.32 was handicapped by a book that is clearly not tuned to >>>hide Fritz's weaknesses. >>> >>>I bet that kasparov will perform worse if you tell him to use the book moves >>>that karpov plays and it means that if you get bad results for Ruffian then your >>>results are even more surprising. >>> >>>Uri >> >> Hi Uri >> I think Jorge wanted to say that Fritz532 clearly won!!! >> And therefore we can't speak about a book handicap. >> Kurt > >Uri, naturally could have meant that Fritz 5.32 was handicapped when released >with general.ctg instead of a book that suited it's playing style as maybe >Shredder8.ctg does. > >Sarah. I meant that Fritz5.32 was handicapped when it was tested with shredder8.ctg and not with a special book that fit its playing style. I did not think about general.ctg as a book that does not fit Fritz5.32's style because I understood that shredder8.ctg was used for Fritz5.32 and not general.ctg Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.