Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 00:21:46 12/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 1998 at 01:53:51, Kai Skibbe wrote: >On December 09, 1998 at 01:43:16, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>Over the past two days & nights I played these games between the Faber Settings >>and the CM6K standard settings, using 64meg hash. >> >>These games were played at 2 minutes a side. >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Win Lose Draw Games Score >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Chessmaster 200 140 60 400 230 >>Faber 140 200 60 400 170 >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >I think 2 minutes per game is a too fast time control to proove anything. And >the hashtable size is too high for blitz games. The program needs some time to >clear the hashtables after every move. Not all programs do this, but cm6k does. > >What about playing 50 games at 30min/game ? This will take about 2 days, but the >result is more valuable. > >Best regards >Kai These games are not to prove the Faber settings, these are in reply's to an earlier post to me in which I said I would play these games, plus with the hash tables, if CM6K can win with this hash then why not the Faber ones. But these games were from an interest point of view for Dan and Harold from earlier posts
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.