Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nimzo 99

Author: Marcus Kaestner

Date: 00:47:06 12/09/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 09, 1998 at 02:51:19, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On December 09, 1998 at 02:02:24, Dr.Rainer Maikowski wrote:
>
>>Its horribly weak.Loosing nearly all games - seldom a draw - in
>>engine-tournaments against Junior5, Fritz5.32 and Hiarcs6.I can`t believe, that
>>it is better than Nimzo98.
>>
>>Rainer Maikowski
>
>This is a pretty strong opinion.  Has anyone else had a similar experience?  Or
>one to the contrary?
>
>Dave Gomboc

Really, on normal settings it´s horribly weak. But why?
The explanation is that it is very very passive on the normal style. it belevies
only on its tactical strength, but that´s not enough. Nimzo 98 tactical not as
strong as Nimzo99, but much more active and on normal settings against other
programs much stronger.

Nimzo 99 plays a terrible chess often such combinations as: Ng6-f8-g6-f8-g6-f8,
doing nothing but waiting and hoping for a tactical chance. Against positional
good programs which are also tactical very strong, it have no chance with this
strategy. But when you change the settings things are changing dramaticly:

For example:
In blitz tournaments Nimzo99 has no chance against Fritz or Junior
30min. games:
Fritz 5 - Nimzo 99 (normal)  10:6
Fritz 5 - Nimzo 99 (Fritz) 8:6
Fritz 5 - Nimzo 99 (Rebel)  8,5:6,5
Junior 5 - Nimzo 99 (normal) 7:4
Junior 5 - Nimzo 99 (Junior) 5:7 !!
Hiarcs 6 - Nimzo 99 (normal) 14:16
Hiarcs 6 - Nimzo 99 (Junior) 3:7 !!!

Tournament games:
Fritz 5 - Nimzo 99 (normal) 6:4
Fritz 5 - Nimzo 99 (fritz) 6,5:4,5
Fritz 5 - Nimzo 99 (Rebel) 5:5 !!

(all on K6-400 with 256MB)

It seems, that the normal style and the Fritz style are really bad (the fritz
style is also more passive than normal!). Junior style is very good against
Junior and Hiarcs, rebel style against other programs. Maybe the rebel style is
the best, also in tests.

But under all aspects Nimzo 99 is no participant for no 1 in sweden. Too passive
and too much positional and endgame-blunders. Not a "round" program.

Greetings
Marcus




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.